This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale
This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale__below
This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale__after

Description

Product Description

More than 600,000 soldiers lost their lives in the American Civil War. An equivalent proportion of today''s population would be six million. In This Republic of Suffering, Drew Gilpin Faust reveals the ways that death on such a scale changed not only individual lives but the life of the nation, describing how the survivors managed on a practical level and how a deeply religious culture struggled to reconcile the unprecedented carnage with its belief in a benevolent God. Throughout, the voices of soldiers and their families, of statesmen, generals, preachers, poets, surgeons, nurses, northerners and southerners come together to give us a vivid understanding of the Civil War''s most fundamental and widely shared reality.

Review

“Extraordinary . . . profoundly moving.” —Geoffrey C. Ward, The New York Times Book Review

 

This Republic of Suffering is one of those groundbreaking histories in which a crucial piece of the past, previously overlooked or misunderstood, suddenly clicks into focus.” —Newsweek

 

“A shattering history of the war, focusing exclusively on death and dying-how Americans prepared for death, imagined it, risked it, endured it and worked to understand it.” —Los Angeles Times Book Review

 

“Faust yanks aside the usual veil of history to look narrowly at life''s intimate level for new perspectives from the past. She focuses on ordinary lives under extreme duress, which makes for compelling reading.” —USA Today

 

“Faust is particularly qualified to identify and explain the complex social and political implications of the changing nature of death as America’s internecine conflict attained its full dimensions.” —Ian Garrick Mason, San Francisco Chronicle

 

“Faust excels in explaining the era’s violent rhetoric and what went on in people’s heads.” —David Waldstreicher, The Boston Globe

 

“The beauty and originality of Faust’s book is that it shows how thoroughly the work of mourning became the business of capitalism, merchandised throughout a society.” —Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker

 

“Fascinating, innovative . . . Faust returns to the task of stripping from war any lingering romanticism, nobility or social purpose.” —Eric Foner, The Nation

 

“Eloquent and imaginative, Ms. Faust’s book takes a grim topic–how America coped with the massive death toll from the Civil War–and makes it fresh and exciting. . . . [A] widely and justly praised scholarly history.” —Adam Begley, New York Observer

 

This Republic of Suffering is a harrowing but fascinating read.” —Marjorie Kehe, The Christian Science Monitor

 

“If you read only one book on the Civil War this year, make it this one.” –Kevin M. Levin, American History

 

“Having always kept the war in her own scholarly sights, Faust offers a compelling reassertion of its basic importance in society and politics alike.” —Richard Wrightman Fox, Slate

 

“[An] astonishing new book.” —Adam Kirsch, The New York Sun

 

“A moving work of social history, detailing how the Civil War changed perceptions and behaviors about death. . . . An illuminating study.” —Kirkus

 

“Penetrating . . . Faust exhumes a wealth of material . . . to flesh out her lucid account. The result is an insightful, often moving portrait of a people torn by grief.” —Publishers Weekly

 

“No other generation of Americans has encountered death on the scale of the Civil War generation. This Republic of Suffering is the first study of how people in both North and South coped with this uniquely devastating experience. How did they mourn the dead, honor their sacrifice, commemorate their memory, and help their families? Drew Gilpin Faust’s powerful and moving answers to these questions provide an important new dimension to our understanding of the Civil War.”

—James M. McPherson, author of This Mighty Scourge: Perspectives on the Civil War

 

“During the Civil War, death reached into the world of the living in ways unknown to Americans before or since. Drew Gilpin Faust follows the carnage in all its aspects, on and off the battlefield. Timely, poignant, and profound, This Republic of Suffering does the real work of history, taking us beyond the statistics until we see the faces of the fallen and understand what it was to live amid such loss and pain.”

—Tony Horowitz, Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War

 

“Drew Gilpin Faust has used her analytical and descriptive gifts to explore how men and women of the Civil War generation came to terms with the conflict’s staggering human toll. Everyone who reads this book will come away with a far better understanding of why the war profoundly affected those who lived through it.”

—Gary W. Gallagher, author of The Confederate War

 

“Drew Faust’s brilliant new book, This Republic of Suffering, builds profoundly from the opening discussion of the Christian ideal of the good death to the last harrowing chapters on the exhumation, partial identification, reburial and counting of the Union dead. In the end one can only conclude, as the author does, that the meaning of the Civil War lies in death itself: in its scale, relentlessness, and enduring cultural effects. This is a powerful and moving book about our nation’s defining historical encounter with the universal human experience of death.”

—Stephanie McCurry, author of Masters of Small Worlds: Yeoman Households, Gender Relations, and the political culture of the Antebellum South Carolina Low Country

 

“Whitman was wrong; the real war did get into the books. This is a wise, informed, troubling book. This Republic of Suffering demolishes sentimentalism for the Civil War in a masterpiece of research, realism, and originality.”

—David W. Blight, author of Race and Reunion: The Civil War in American Memory

About the Author

Drew Gilpin Faust is president of Harvard University, where she also holds the Lincoln Professorship in History. Dean of the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study from 2001 to 2007, she came to Harvard after twenty-five years on the faculty of the University of Pennsylvania. She is the author of five previous books, including Mothers of Invention: Women of the Slaveholding South in the American Civil War, which won the Francis Parkman Prize and the Avery Craven Prize. She and her husband live in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.

Preface: The work of deathMortality defines the human condition. “We all have our dead–we all have our Graves,” a Confederate Episcopal bishop observed in an 1862 sermon. Every era, he explained, must confront “like miseries”; every age must search for “like consolation.” Yet death has its discontinuities as well. Men and women approach death in ways shaped by history, by culture, by conditions that vary over time and across space. Even though “we all have our dead,” and even though we all die, we do so differently from generation to generation and from place to place.[1]In the middle of the nineteenth century, the United States embarked on a new relationship with death, entering into a civil war that proved bloodier than any other conflict in American history, a war that would presage the slaughter of World War I’s Western Front and the global carnage of the twentieth century. The number of soldiers who died between 1861 and 1865, an estimated 620,000, is approximately equal to the total American fatalities in the Revolution, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, the Spanish-American War, World War I, World War II, and the Korean War combined. The Civil War’s rate of death, its incidence in comparison with the size of the American population, was six times that of World War II. A similar rate, about 2 percent, in the United States today would mean six million fatalities. As the new southern nation struggled for survival against a wealthier and more populous enemy, its death toll reflected the disproportionate strains on its human capital. Confederate men died at a rate three times that of their Yankee counterparts; one in five white southern men of military age did not survive the Civil War.[2]But these military statistics tell only a part of the story. The war killed civilians as well, as battles raged across farm and field, as encampments of troops spread epidemic disease, as guerrillas ensnared women and even children in violence and reprisals, as draft rioters targeted innocent citizens, as shortages of food in parts of the South brought starvation. No one sought to document these deaths systematically, and no one has devised a method of undertaking a retrospective count. The distinguished Civil War historian James McPherson has estimated that there were fifty thousand civilian deaths during the war, and he has concluded that the overall mortality rate for the South exceeded that of any country in World War I and that of all but the region between the Rhine and the Volga in World War II. The American Civil War produced carnage that has often been thought reserved for the combination of technological proficiency and inhumanity characteristic of a later time.[3]The impact and meaning of the war’s death toll went beyond the sheer numbers who died. Death’s significance for the Civil War generation arose as well from its violation of prevailing assumptions about life’s proper end–about who should die, when and where, and under what circumstances. Death was hardly unfamiliar to mid-nineteenth-century Americans. By the beginning of the 1860s the rate of death in the United States had begun to decline, although dramatic improvements in longevity would not appear until late in the century. Americans of the immediate prewar era continued to be more closely acquainted with death than are their twenty-first century counterparts. But the patterns to which they were accustomed were in significant ways different from those the war would introduce. The Civil War represented a dramatic shift in both incidence and experience. Mid-nineteenth-century Americans endured a high rate of infant mortality but expected that most individuals who reached young adulthood would survive at least into middle age. The war took young, healthy men and rapidly, often instantly, destroyed them with disease or injury. This marked a sharp and alarming departure from existing preconceptions about who should die. As Francis W. Palfrey wrote in an 1864 memorial for Union soldier Henry L. Abbott, “the blow seems heaviest when it strikes down those who are in the morning of life.” A soldier was five times more likely to die than he would have been if he had not entered the army. As a chaplain explained to his Connecticut regiment in the middle of the war, “neither he nor they had ever lived and faced death in such a time, with its peculiar conditions and necessities.” Civil War soldiers and civilians alike distinguished what many referred to as “ordinary death,” as it had occurred in prewar years, from the manner and frequency of death in Civil War battlefields, hospitals, and camps, and from the war’s interruptions of civilian lives.[4]In the Civil War the United States, North and South, reaped what many participants described as a “harvest of death.” By the midpoint of the conflict, it seemed that in the South, “nearly every household mourns some loved one lost.” Loss became commonplace; death was no longer encountered individually; death’s threat, its proximity, and its actuality became the most widely shared of the war’s experiences. As a Confederate soldier observed, death “reigned with universal sway,” ruling homes and lives, demanding attention and response. The Civil War matters to us today because it ended slavery and helped to define the meanings of freedom, citizenship, and equality. It established a newly centralized nation-state and launched it on a trajectory of economic expansion and world influence. But for those Americans who lived in and through the Civil War, the texture of the experience, its warp and woof, was the presence of death. At war’s end this shared suffering would override persisting differences about the meanings of race, citizenship, and nationhood to establish sacrifice and its memorialization as the ground on which North and South would ultimately reunite. Even in our own time this fundamentally elegiac understanding of the Civil War retains a powerful hold.[5]Death transformed the American nation as well as the hundreds of thousands of individuals directly affected by loss. The war created a veritable “republic of suffering,” in the words that Frederick Law Olmsted chose to describe the wounded and dying arriving at Union hospital ships on the Virginia Peninsula. Sacrifice and the state became inextricably intertwined. Citizen soldiers snatched from the midst of life generated obligations for a nation defining its purposes and polity through military struggle. A war about union, citizenship, freedom, and human dignity required that the government attend to the needs of those who had died in its service. Execution of these newly recognized responsibilities would prove an important vehicle for the expansion of federal power that characterized the transformed postwar nation. The establishment of national cemeteries and the emergence of the Civil War pension system to care for both the dead and their survivors yielded programs of a scale and reach unimaginable before the war. Death created the modern American union–not just by ensuring national survival, but by shaping enduring national structures and commitments.[6]Civil War Americans often wrote about what they called “the work of death,” meaning the duties of soldiers to fight, kill, and die, but at the same time invoking battle’s consequences: its slaughter, suffering, and devastation. “Work” in this usage incorporated both effort and impact–and the important connection between the two. Death in war does not simply happen; it requires action and agents. It must, first of all, be inflicted; and several million soldiers of the 1860s dedicated themselves to that purpose. But death also usually requires participation and response; it must be experienced and handled. It is work to die, to know how to approach and endure life’s last moments. Of all living things, only humans consciously anticipate death; the consequent need to choose how to behave in its face–to worry about how to die–distinguishes us from other animals. The need to manage death is the particular lot of humanity.[7]It is work to deal with the dead as well, to remove them in the literal sense of disposing of their bodies, and it is also work to remove them in a more figurative sense. The bereaved struggle to separate themselves from the dead through ritual and mourning. Families and communities must repair the rent in the domestic and social fabric, and societies, nations, and cultures must work to understand and explain unfathomable loss.This is a book about the work of death in the American CivilWar. It seeks to describe how between 1861 and 1865–and into the decades that followed–Americans undertook a kind of work that history has not adequately understood or recognized. Human beings are rarely simply passive victims of death. They are actors even if they are the diers; they prepare for death, imagine it, risk it, endure it, seek to understand it. And if they are survivors, they must assume new identities established by their persistence in face of others’ annihilation. The presence and fear of death touched Civil War Americans’ most fundamental sense of who they were, for in its threat of termination and transformation, death inevitably inspired self-scrutiny and self-definition. Beginning with individuals’ confrontation with dying and killing, the book explores how those experiences transformed society, culture, and politics in what became a broader republic of shared suffering. Some of the changes death brought were social, as wives turned into widows, children into orphans; some were political, as African American soldiers hoped to win citizenship and equality through their willingness both to die and to kill; some were philosophical and spiritual, as the carnage compelled Americans to seek meaning and explanation for war’s destruction.Every death involved “the great change” captured in the language and discourse of nineteenth-century Christianity, the shift from this life to whatever might come next. A subject of age-old concern for believers and nonbelievers alike, the existence and nature of an afterlife took on new urgency both for soldiers anxious about their own deaths and for bereaved kin speculating on the fate of the departed. And even if spirits and souls proved indeed immortal, there still remained the vexing question of bodies. The traditional notion that corporeal resurrection and restoration would accompany the Day of Judgment seemed increasingly implausible to many Americans who had seen the maiming and disfigurement inflicted by this war. Witnesses at field hospitals almost invariably commented with horror on the piles of limbs lying near the surgeon’s table, dissociated from the bodies to which they had belonged, transformed into objects of revulsion instead of essential parts of people. These arms and legs seemed as unidentifiable–and unrestorable–as the tens of thousands of missing men who had been separated from their names. The integral relationship between the body and the human self it housed was as shattered as the wounded men.[8]Bodies were in important ways the measure of the war–of its achievements and its impact; and indeed, bodies became highly visible in Civil War America. Commanders compared their own and enemy casualties as evidence of military success or failure. Soldiers struggled for the words to describe mangled corpses strewn across battlefields; families contemplated the significance of newspaper lists of wounds: “slightly, in the shoulder,” “severely, in the groin,” “mortally, in the breast.” They nursed the dying and buried their remains. Letters and reports from the front rendered the physicality of injuries and death all but unavoidable. For the first time civilians directly confronted the reality of battlefield death rendered by the new art of photography. They found themselves transfixed by the paradoxically lifelike renderings of the slain of Antietam that Mathew Brady exhibited in his studio on Broadway. If Brady “has not brought bodies and laid them in our dooryards and along the streets, he has done something very like it,” wrote the New York Times.[9]This new prominence of bodies overwhelmingly depicted their destruction and deformation, inevitably raising the question of how they related to the persons who had once inhabited them. In the aftermath of battle survivors often shoveled corpses into pits as they would dispose of animals–“in bunches, just like dead chickens,” one observer noted–dehumanizing both the living and the dead through their disregard. In Civil War death the distinction between men and animals threatened to disappear, just as it was simultaneously eroding in the doctrines of nineteenth-century science.[10]The Civil War confronted Americans with an enormous task, one quite different from saving or dividing the nation, ending or maintaining slavery, or winning the military conflict–the demands we customarily understand to have been made of the Civil War generation. Americans North and South would be compelled to confront–and resist–the war’s assault on their conceptions of how life should end, an assault that challenged their most fundamental assumptions about life’s value and meaning. As they faced horrors that forced them to question their ability to cope, their commitment to the war, even their faith in a righteous God, soldiers and civilians alike struggled to retain their most cherished beliefs, to make them work in the dramatically altered world that war had introduced. Americans had to identify–find, invent, create–the means and mechanisms to manage more than half a million dead: their deaths, their bodies, their loss. How they accomplished this task reshaped their individual lives–and deaths–at the same time that it redefined their nation and their culture. The work of death was Civil War America’s most fundamental and most demanding undertaking. NOTES[1] [Stephen Elliott], Obsequies of the Reverend Edward E. Ford, D.D., and Sermon by the Bishop of the Diocese . . . (Augusta, Ga.: Augusta Chronicle and Sentinel, 1863), p. 8.[2] James David Hacker, “The Human Cost of War: White Population in the United States, 1850—1880,” Ph.D. diss. (University of Minnesota, 1999), pp. 1, 14. Hacker believes that Civil War death totals may be seriously understated because of inadequate estimates of the number of Confederate deaths from disease. Civil War casualty and mortality statistics are problematic overall, and the incompleteness of Confederate records makes them especially unreliable. See Chapter 8 of this book. Maris A. Vinovskis concludes that about 6 percent of northern white males between ages thirteen and forty-five died in the war, whereas 18 percent of white men of similar age in the South perished. But because of much higher levels of military mobilization in the white South, mortality rates for southern soldiers were twice, not three times, as great as those for northern soldiers. James McPherson cites these soldiers’ death rates as 31 percent for Confederate soldiers, 16 percent for Union soldiers. Gary Gallagher believes Vinovskis’s overall death rate for the South is too low; he estimates that closer to one in four rather than one in five white southern men of military age died in the conflict. I have cited the more conservative total. See Vinovskis, “Have Social Historians Lost the Civil War?” in Maris A. Vinovskis, ed., Toward a Social History of the American Civil War: Exploratory Essays (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), pp. 3—7; James M. McPherson, personal communication to author, December 27, 2006; Gary Gallagher, personal communication to author, December 16, 2006.[3] James M. McPherson, Crossroads of Freedom: Antietam (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), pp. 3, 177, n. 56.[4] [Francis W. Palfrey], In Memoriam: H.L.A. (Boston: Printed for private distribution, 1864), p. 5; Richard Shryock, “A Medical Perspective on the Civil War,” American Quarterly 14 (Summer 1962): 164; H. Clay Trumbull, War Memories of an Army Chaplain (New York: C. Scribner’s Sons, 1898), p. 67. Vital statistics for this period are very scarce, and the most complete cover only Massachusetts. I am grateful to historical demographer Gretchen Condran of Temple University for discussing these matters with me. See U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Part I (Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1975), pp. 62—63. On the “untimely death of an adult child” as “particularly painful” in mid-nineteenth-century England, see Patricia Jalland, Death in the Victorian Family (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996), p. 39.[5] One notable appearance of the image of a harvest of death is in the title given Timothy O’Sullivan’s photograph of a field of bodies at Gettysburg in Alexander Gardner, Gardner’s Photographic Sketchbook of the War (1866; rpt. New York: Dover, 1959), plate 36; Kate Stone, Brokenburn: The Journal of Kate Stone, 1861—1868, ed. John Q. Anderson (Baton Rouge: Louisiana University Press, 1955), p. 264; C. W. Greene to John McLees, August 15, 1862, McLees Family Papers, SCL.[6] [Frederick Law Olmsted], Hospital Transports: A Memoir of the Embarkation of the Sick and Wounded from the Peninsula of Virginia in the Summer of 1862 (Boston: Ticknor & Fields, 1863), p. 115.[7] The general literature on death is immense and rich. A few key texts not cited elsewhere in this volume include Thomas Lynch, The Undertaking: Life Studies from the Dismal Trade (New York: W. W. Norton, 1997); Thomas Lynch, Bodies in Motion and at Rest: On Metaphor and Mortality (New York: W. W. Norton, 2000); Sandra Gilbert, Death’s Door: Modern Dying and the Way We Grieve (New York: W. W. Norton, 2006); Paul Monette, Borrowed Time: An AIDS Memoir (San Diego, Calif.: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1988); Paul Monette, Last Watch of the Night (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1994); Jessica Mitford, The American Way of Death (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1963); Sherwin B. Nuland, How We Die: Reflections on Life’s Final Chapter (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1994); Maurice Bloch and Jonathan Parry, eds., Death and the Regeneration of Life (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982); Peter Metcalf and Richard Huntington, Celebrations of Death: The Anthropology of Mortuary Ritual, 2nd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1991).[8] Mrs. Carson to R. F. Taylor, September 14, 1864, Carson Family Papers, SCL. On changing notions of the self, see Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of Modern Identity (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1989), and Jerrold Seigel, The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe Since the Seventeenth Century (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005).[9] New York Times, October 20, 1862. See William A. Frassanito, Antietam: The Photographic Legacy of America’s Bloodiest Day (New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1978); Franny Nudelman, John Brown’s Body: Slavery, Violence and the Culture of War (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2004), pp. 103—31; and Alan Trachtenberg, Reading American Photographs: Images as History, Mathew Brady to Walker Evans (New York: Hill & Wang, 1989). Even as we acknowledge the impact of Civil War photography, it is important to recognize how few Americans would actually have seen Brady’s or other photographs of the dead. Newspapers and periodicals could not yet reproduce photographs but could publish only engravings derived from them, like the many Harper’s Weekly illustrations included in this book.[10] Maude Morrow Brown Manuscript, z/0907.000/S, Mississippi Department of Archives and History, Jackson, Miss.; on nineteenth-century science and the changed meaning of death, see Adam Phillips, Darwin’s Worms: On Life Stories and Death Stories (New York: Basic Books, 2000).

Product information

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Videos

Help others learn more about this product by uploading a video!
Upload video
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Customers who bought this item also bought

Customer reviews

4.5 out of 54.5 out of 5
582 global ratings

Reviews with images

Top reviews from the United States

Deanne's kindle
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
dying a "good death"
Reviewed in the United States on September 23, 2016
This is a monumentally important book about American religious beliefs, and the cultural and familial traditions deeply affected by the mass deaths and carnage of the Civil War. The author lays a sensitive and profound foundation of the religious meaning of death before and... See more
This is a monumentally important book about American religious beliefs, and the cultural and familial traditions deeply affected by the mass deaths and carnage of the Civil War. The author lays a sensitive and profound foundation of the religious meaning of death before and during the outbreak of the war. The beloved cultural and familial traditions were such that when the time came, each soul required family support to die a "good death". This entailed carefully tending to the dying, aiding (if necessary) and witnessing his/her verbal readiness to meet God. As the war became more brutal and overwhelming, burial traditions broke down. With tens of thousands of men away from home, the military was unprepared to bury, much less record, massive deaths for what all thought would be a short war. Most men died without family, although soldiers wounded on the field still tried to die a "good death" if they survived long enough and had a witness to tell their family. Others died instantly with nothing left to bury. Others were buried by military buddies, but without a lasting marker. Others were piled together in quickly dug pits for shallow burial. And for every son, brother, father, etc., a family was left behind, devastated in its tortured grieving: did he die a "good death", where is he buried, is he truly dead, and how could God allow such brutality and carnage - on both sides ("... how could God be on both sides?") Many came to question their religion and the existence of God. Military burials changed after Lincoln''s address, giving us Gettysburg National Cemetery, and then others. Garden-like, well-maintained, burial location without regard to rank. The aftermath of so much bloodshed on families was extensive in most churches and faiths, also thoroughly researched by the author.

This review is very much a 5 star and would have been a 6 if I could have. Will read it again.
35 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
David Southworth
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Fantastic Social History
Reviewed in the United States on March 4, 2017
This was a fantastic book, though sometimes hard to stomach. Most Civil War books are about great battles and specific generals. Drew Gilpin Fast''s book, This Republic of Suffering, covers something much more personal. The tremendous change that swept the United States due... See more
This was a fantastic book, though sometimes hard to stomach. Most Civil War books are about great battles and specific generals. Drew Gilpin Fast''s book, This Republic of Suffering, covers something much more personal. The tremendous change that swept the United States due to the horrendous number of war dead. The US had never experienced anything like this; especially not in a short four year period.

Gilpin Faust covers a number of issues related to how Americans dealt with death. There was the issue of whether the relative had a "good" death, meaning essentially they were ready to face their maker. There was identification and burial of war dead. Many were lucky to be able to identify dead loved ones. Many others were not so lucky, and so had to take solace that their loved ones were buried with comrades. Gilpin Faust discusses the different ways each side dealt with war dead. The north had the advantage in being able to identify and transport back war dead because of resources. The south was stretched thin.

All round this was a fantastic book, touching on a little discussed or studied aspect of our great civil war. I highly recommend this book.
16 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
Mary Soon LeeTop Contributor: Fantasy Books
2.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A widely-acclaimed book, but I found it underwhelming.
Reviewed in the United States on July 11, 2018
This book examines the Civil War dead: their vast numbers (over six hundred thousand), how they died, the significance of their deaths. I had expected it to be a grim yet fascinating account. Others must have found it so: the book was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize and... See more
This book examines the Civil War dead: their vast numbers (over six hundred thousand), how they died, the significance of their deaths. I had expected it to be a grim yet fascinating account. Others must have found it so: the book was a finalist for the Pulitzer Prize and the National Book Award. I, however, found it less engaging than the subject matter suggested. Despite notable quotes and haunting incidents, there was a flatness to the book, at least for me.... One of the sections that I found comparatively interesting discussed Civil War authors including Ambrose Bierce, Emily Dickinson, Herman Melville, and Walt Whitman, and left me far more eager to read their work than to finish "This Republic of Suffering."
11 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
Arcane Thought
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Quite good
Reviewed in the United States on December 21, 2020
I just started reading about the Civil War. I had this book in a pile and it seemed small so I started reading it to pad my numbers for the year. I didn''t read the cover and thought it was about battles or history and it was so much more. This i sa study of death... See more
I just started reading about the Civil War. I had this book in a pile and it seemed small so I started reading it to pad my numbers for the year. I didn''t read the cover and thought it was about battles or history and it was so much more.

This i sa study of death in the Civil War. How it affected the men fighting and the family left at home. It is a history of how this country began to care and identify those that gave all fighting for a government be it North or South.

The chapter on embalming was fascinating to me. Then came the chapter on finding these men''s bodies and burying them properly. Them men and woman that made it there life''s work to find these men, attempt to identify them and bury them properly was so powerful. I was appalled that both the North and South treated the other sides dead bodies so vilely. I guess it makes me understand how today we are refighting something that happened 150 years ago. We can forgive foreign enemies but we can''t forgive our own countrymen.
One person found this helpful
Helpful
Report
Wayne A. Smith
3.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Two Books in One: Litany of Response to Loss and Description of Efforts to Properly Care for Deceased Soldiers
Reviewed in the United States on August 4, 2015
This is two books - a series of essays on aspects of death in and around The Civil War; and, chapters on the how of identification, location, retrieval and reburial of the 600,000 of our fellow citizens who spent their all in the great event of our national story.... See more
This is two books - a series of essays on aspects of death in and around The Civil War; and, chapters on the how of identification, location, retrieval and reburial of the 600,000 of our fellow citizens who spent their all in the great event of our national story.

Faust describes attitudes toward death prior to The Civil War - particularly the concept of the "good death" and dying well. His book spends much of its ink on describing how various Americans reacted to the death of loved ones in service and the trauma that death away from home, often with the remains lost or in unmarked graves had on the families and loved ones who watched their men go to war. Walt Whitman''s melancholy and missionary zeal as he provided comfort to the wounded and dying during the last years of the war is recounted to poetically frame the effect such continual suffering had on individuals and the nation. A host of unknown American''s diary reminiscences are also used to underscore the effect of mass carnage and individual loss as experienced by loved ones.

A little nation with a heretofore little army was not prepared to deal with the mass casualties produced by The Civil War. The author describes the haphazard nature of body disposal and grave marking that attended most of the conflict. The national government had to invent systems of dealing with the great amount of wounded produced by vicious battle and this took understandable priority over the care of the dead. This lack of planning and organization meant that a generation of Americans who would have to deal with the tragedy of loss would also have to suffer the extra emotional burden of not knowing where their loved one remained near the battle that saw their demise or which one of the vast number of graves whose location was known but whose remains were not did contain their husband, son or brother.

The war did, in its aftermath, spur major efforts to locate, rebury and commemorate the fallen. This had the assistance of bureaucracy for northern dead; for the southern fallen, volunteer societies tried to assist in appropriate treatment of their lost sons.

The book was hit or miss for me. I thought the chapters dealing with reaction to loss and suffering were somewhat repetitive and ended up often underscoring the author''s points over and over again. This sense of loss is described in many histories of the conflict and while the author''s focus gave it a greater scope than other works, it didn''t really provide anything new to this reader. Personally, I found interesting and learned a lot about efforts to deal with the dead and establish the national military cemeteries that I had not encountered before. The chapters dealing with those issues were more interesting to me and I suspect would be for most Civil War buffs.
11 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
Francis O Walker
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A Requiem for the Republic
Reviewed in the United States on January 22, 2021
Beautifully written and well researched, this book explains the impact of the mortal carnage of the Civil War, North and South. It contrasts a statistical approach in capturing the extent of war''s catastrophe with the exploration individual casualties and how each was a... See more
Beautifully written and well researched, this book explains the impact of the mortal carnage of the Civil War, North and South. It contrasts a statistical approach in capturing the extent of war''s catastrophe with the exploration individual casualties and how each was a calamity for a family or community. The author, Drew Gilpin Faust, uses both approaches to explain the crisis in religious thinking that the conflict created. This book is particularly topical today, as it describes how a deeply divided nation eventually reunited. Highly recommended for students of history of any age.
Helpful
Report
Chris Sterling
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Grim but fascinating . . .
Reviewed in the United States on February 6, 2018
There''s little I can add to the many reviews here and elsewhere, save that this is an excellent read and I learned a lot. Okay, I skimmed some of the literary discussion, but the practical aspects of dealing with seemingly countless bodies (human and otherwise)--especially... See more
There''s little I can add to the many reviews here and elsewhere, save that this is an excellent read and I learned a lot. Okay, I skimmed some of the literary discussion, but the practical aspects of dealing with seemingly countless bodies (human and otherwise)--especially in hot weather--are brought forcefully home. So are such things as keeping track (or more often, not) of who''s who so as to inform next of kin and set up final postwar resting places. All of this had to be earned from scratch by both sides, and the south never fully caught up. The bitterness of both sides toward the dead and wounded of the "enemy" is something appalling.
4 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report
Iceland Spar
3.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Another way of seeing
Reviewed in the United States on November 3, 2016
Not necessarily well-written, this otherwise fascinating but gut-wrenching work demonstrates the painful lives and deaths of soldiers on either side of the Civil War. This is a new take on the still-contentious time in American history. Instead of descriptions of battles,... See more
Not necessarily well-written, this otherwise fascinating but gut-wrenching work demonstrates the painful lives and deaths of soldiers on either side of the Civil War. This is a new take on the still-contentious time in American history. Instead of descriptions of battles, generals, and the principles of what was a sort of jihad of its day, the author uses letters, images and statistics to burn what was the true cost of the war into your mind and heart. Faust shows you another way of viewing America''s (as yet) only homegrown conflict..
5 people found this helpful
Helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Jim Hanna, Co. Antrim, Northern Ireland
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
A truly Civil War classic.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 24, 2018
A compelling account of the personal and social impact of the savagery and carnage on those who fought and survived the American Civil War as well as on the relatives and friends of those who didn''t survive. There is no attempt by the author to justify the rights or wrongs...See more
A compelling account of the personal and social impact of the savagery and carnage on those who fought and survived the American Civil War as well as on the relatives and friends of those who didn''t survive. There is no attempt by the author to justify the rights or wrongs of the war nor analyse the tactics employed at individual battles, but, more importantly, she describes the social and personal cost that would lead to the formation of one of the great democracies of the world.
Report
María
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Great book about the Civil War
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on June 12, 2020
I have just started reading this book, and I find it really informative regarding the mores surrounding death in Victorian America, and the way they were changed during and after the Civil War. I highly recommend it for anyone doing research on the subject.
Report
GZ
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Well written, well researched, but little-known topic of ...
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on November 30, 2015
Well written, well researched, but little-known topic of the meaning of death in mid-nineteenth century America. Most of the book was a complete revelation, despite having read a lot of Civil War histories. If you want to explore how the Civil War affected American lives...See more
Well written, well researched, but little-known topic of the meaning of death in mid-nineteenth century America. Most of the book was a complete revelation, despite having read a lot of Civil War histories. If you want to explore how the Civil War affected American lives and, in the end, the American psyche, read this book.
Report
CHRIS EVERITT
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
Superb resource covering after the battle
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on February 20, 2021
This book covers the aftermath of the battle and how those who perished were cared for. Superb book.
Report
Alexander McKay
5.0 out of 5 starsVerified Purchase
enjoyed it all
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on October 6, 2017
Superb account, enjoyed it all immensely
Report
See all reviews
Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Customers who viewed this item also viewed

Brief content visible, double tap to read full content.
Full content visible, double tap to read brief content.

Explore similar books

Tags that will help you discover similar books. 13 tags
Results for: 
Where do clickable book tags come from?

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale

This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil online sale War (Vintage outlet online sale Civil War Library) online sale